

Click for Contents

P.O. Box 1805,Jerusalem 91017
Tel. 972-2-531-5440, Fax: 972-2-537-9489
Advertising Fax: 972-2-531-5425, Email Editorial: [email protected]
Subscriptions: [email protected] Web site: http://www.jrep.com
|
|
 |



Ehud Ya'ari: Handle with Care
Every incident in Gaza could fuel a crisis between Cairo and Jerusalem
Prime Minister Sharon is feverishly seeking an agreement with the Egyptians for cooperation in realizing his Gaza Strip withdrawal plan. On top of the understandings already reached with President Bush, the beleaguered politician is now trying to develop a partnership with President Mubarak.
There is nothing inherently wrong with this idea, so long as Israel proceeds with great caution. Dragging a reluctant Egypt into the boiling cauldron of the intifada is no light matter, and it brings with it as many risks as chances of success.
The zeal of certain individuals in the Prime Minister�s Office to entice the Egyptians into returning to Gaza arouses fears of a serious flaw in their understanding of the fragile structure of peace between the two countries. To hitch this bilateral relationship to the Palestinian issue is a radical departure from the form of coexistence molded since the Sadat-Begin era of the late 1970s.
A quick reminder: Egypt went for peace with Israel precisely to cut itself free of its bondage to the Palestinian problem. First there was an attempt to come to an agreement with Israel over self-rule in the territories, but in 1982 Mubarak discarded that fig leaf too. Ever since, Cairo has stuck to a systematic, consistent policy of disengagement from any direct involvement in the Palestinian issue. This, in turn, has allowed the peace treaty to withstand such traumas as the Sharon-inspired war against the PLO in Lebanon and the pre- and post-Oslo intifadas.
The Egyptian decision to disengage was reflected, for example, in the intentional decimation of the pro-Egyptian lobby among the Gaza Palestinians, in the obstacles faced by students from the Strip who wanted to study in Egyptian universities, in the refusal to export Gaza oranges via Sinai and Port Said on the Suez Canal and so on. Egypt simply washed its hands of the Strip and made sure there were no cracks in the barricade it erected between them.
Of course, the Egyptians never abandoned their pro-Palestinian posture in the diplomatic and propaganda spheres, their support for Palestinian actions and their stinging criticism of Israeli behavior. However, they stringently compartmentalized these issues in a drawer apart from the cold but stable peace they have maintained with Israel over all these years. In fact, this peace has survived only because it was always sifted clean of the Palestinian context.
Moreover, the Egyptian leadership has long since come to the somewhat ironic conclusion that removing itself from any active role -- let alone one of patronage -- vis-�-vis the Palestinians eases Cairo�s relations with the other Arab states. Throwing away the autonomy plan in the early 1980s paved the way for the cancellation of the pan-Arab boycott of Egypt which had been in force since the Camp David accords of 1978.
In short, Egypt feels comfortable and safe when it keeps its distance from the Palestinian headache. The Egyptians are more relaxed when they are cheering or jeering at Gaza from across the Sinai�s dunes.
Now they are interested in helping quiet down the intifada. That�s why they responded to Sharon�s requests to agree to send some 200-300 advisers and trainers to assist the Palestinian security forces in the Strip. They are also prepared to replace the police currently guarding their side of the Philadelphi Route along the Gaza-Egypt border with more effective units, to cut the flow of smuggled arms into Palestinian territory. And after failing in their attempts to lobby Yasser Arafat to halt the terror, they are apparently ready to function as baby-sitters, coordinating steps that will curtail Arafat�s authorities and putting acceptable figures such as Muhammad Dahlan in charge of the Strip. The Egyptians have also presented Arafat with lists of officers to be fired from their jobs and they are acting as facilitators between the Muqata�ah and Sharon among other things on the idea of moving Arafat from Ramallah to Gaza.
At this stage, it is not at all clear whether Egypt will follow through with this change in approach. Arafat, for one, is not at all enthusiastic and is sending out his aides to attack Mubarak for having "surrendered" to Sharon. Nevertheless, the picture that seems to be emerging is for some kind of Egyptian "sponsorship" over the Palestinian administration in Gaza. Even if Mubarak refuses to take upon himself full responsibility, Egypt will be a directly involved party.
If this plan proceeds smoothly, with no serious complications, it will represent an important Egyptian contribution to pacification, as well as to fundamental change within the Palestinian Authority and its relations with Israel. But the working assumption must be more pessimistic. The Egyptians could find themselves entangled in the coil of the Israeli-Palestinian confrontation. Every incident in the Strip could fuel a crisis between Cairo and Jerusalem. The measure of success in stopping the intifada will become the barometer of the peace between the two countries, and the Palestinians will wield an influence they don�t have today over the game of competitive containment between Israel and Egypt.
Therefore, there must be clear understandings from the outset between Mubarak and Sharon on the scope of Egyptian intervention and, essentially, the amount of grace Israel is willing to extend when it comes to examining progress. Israel has no interest in having Egypt bogged down in the Gazan dunghill. If the Egyptians can be helpful, fine. But if they become helpless, it�s a recipe for disaster. Most important is the preservation of what has been achieved so far: the insulation of the Land of the Nile from the troubles of the Holy Land.
June 28, 2004
Columnists
- David Horovitz: History Repeating Itself
- Hirsh Goodman: Legal Limits
- Ehud Ya'ari: Demolish for Peace
- Stuart Schoffman: Healing from Zion
- David Horovitz: The Pregnancy Test
- Hirsh Goodman: On Top of Everything Else
- Gershom Gorenberg: Return to Hawara
- David Horovitz: The Elephant and the Gavel
- Hirsh Goodman: Is The War Over?
- Ehud Ya'ari: Slowing Down
- David Horovitz: Making Withdrawal Even Tougher
- Hirsh Goodman: A Historic Decision
- Ehud Ya'ari: Handle with Care
- David Horovitz: Creative Thinking
- Hirsh Goodman: Beneath It All
- Ehud Ya'ari: Dreams across the River
- Stuart Schoffman: Ethics of My Father
- David Horovitz: Ask All the People
- Hirsh Goodman: The Disengagement Party
- Ehud Ya'ari: Not So Fast
- Hirsh Goodman: Still Baffled over Vanunu
- Ehud Ya'ari: �Gated Community�
- Stuart Schoffman: A Measure of Kindness
- Judy Maltz: Bibi�s Bonus
- David Horovitz: Learning From Lockerbie
- Hirsh Goodman: Happy Independence Day, Despite It All
- David Horovitz: But Was It Wise?
- Ehud Ya'ari: Keep the Gloves Off
- Stuart Schoffman: Under the Banner of Heaven
- David Horovitz: As the Walls Close In
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Eastern Border
- Gershom Gorenberg: Sharon�s Bulldozers, Then and Now
- Ehud Ya'ari: Get It Right This Time
- Judy Maltz: Bank Shots
- David Horovitz: Steering Blind
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Road to Katif
- Gershom Gorenberg: Fundamentalism on Film
- David Horovitz: A Baffling Exchange, or Worse
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Not So Bad
- Stuart Schoffman: Regime Change
- David Horovitz: Park Your Caravans Elsewhere, the Envoy Says
- Ehud Ya'ari: Marking Time, Regressively
- Gershom Gorenberg: Dump Bush, Help Israel
- David Horovitz: A Strategy for Disengagement
- Hirsh Goodman: Get Smart
- Ehud Ya'ari: Why There, and Not Here?
- Stuart Schoffman: Going South
- David Horovitz: Qadhafi or Saddam
- Hirsh Goodman: A Quiet Earthquake
- Gershom Gorenberg: Legacy of the Kiosk Caper
- Ehud Ya'ari: An Offer in Disguise
- David Horovitz: Dr. Olmert�s Diagnosis
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Northern Slippery Slope
- David Horovitz: Intolerable Complacency
- Ehud Ya'ari: �Shabbat Shalom, Dirty Jews�
- Judy Maltz: Formula for Tragedy
- David Horovitz: Not Just Anti-Semitism
- Hirsh Goodman: A Look in the Mirror
- Ehud Ya'ari: Pipe Dreams
- Stuart Schoffman: Uncomfortable Positions
- David Horovitz: The Travails of a Rejected Politician
- Hirsh Goodman: Amir's Curse
- Gershom Gorenberg: Prefer Peace to the Temple Mount
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Hamas-Jihad Axis
- David Horovitz: Sharon Loses Israel
- Hirsh Goodman: Cries in the Dark
- David Horovitz: He�s Winning
- Hirsh Goodman: Message from Above
- Ehud Ya'ari: Meet Abu Ala
- David Horovitz: Don�t Avenge Us, Protect Us
- Hirsh Goodman: A Harmful Illusion
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Either with Him -- or without Him
- Stuart Schoffman: Close to Home
- David Horovitz: Give Them All an F
- Hirsh Goodman: Gosh! We Have a Problem
- Ehud Ya'ari: Counterattack
- David Horovitz: In a Land Too Near Chelm
- Stuart Schoffman: Rejoicing with Rafaela
- David Horovitz: Happy �Hudna�?
- Hirsh Goodman: The Silence of the Lambs
- David Horovitz: Ilan Ramon�s Vital Perspective
- Hirsh Goodman: Time to Take a Bow
- Ehud Ya'ari: Syria�s Silent Earthquake
- Gershom Gorenberg: Anti-Family Values
- David Horovitz: Don�t Open the Champagne Yet
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Over
- Hirsh Goodman: Boom Baby Boom
- David Horovitz: The Glass Half Full
- Hirsh Goodman: Civil War, Uncivil Behavior
- Stuart Schoffman: The Circumcision Monologues
- David Horovitz: As the Pastoral Memories of Aqaba Fade
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon the Unspontaneous
- Ehud Ya'ari: Riding Low
- David Horovitz: Lobbying, and Its Limits
- Hirsh Goodman: My Yiddishe Brother
- Ehud Ya'ari: Yes Now, Buts Later
- David Horovitz: Goodbye, Mitzna. Goodbye, Labor?
- Hirsh Goodman: Boss Sharon
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Baghdad Effect
- David Horovitz: By Their Tourist Sites You Shall Know Them
- Hirsh Goodman: A �Nebechdik� Race
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Small White Hope
- David Horovitz: Thinking the Unthinkable
- Ehud Ya'ari: A Pesah Miracle
- Gershom Gorenberg: Where the Free Market Flunks
- David Horovitz: Hoping for a More Peaceful Pesah
- Hirsh Goodman: 'In-bedding'
- Ehud Ya'ari: Where Have All the Flowers Gone?
- Stuart Schoffman: The Memory of Egypt
- David Horovitz: Meanwhile, in Iran...
- Hirsh Goodman: On the Firing Line
- David Horovitz: Ejected
- Hirsh Goodman: On Hope
- Ehud Ya'ari: Mahdi Now
- David Horovitz: The Highest Stakes
- Hirsh Goodman: Danger: Big Spender
- Ehud Ya'ari: Yes, Prime Minister!
- David Horovitz: Who Won the Elections?
- Hirsh Goodman: On Symbolism
- Ehud Ya'ari: A Sinai Rendezvous
- Stuart Schoffman: Among School Children
- Ehud Ya'ari: Beware of a �Farhoud�
- David Horovitz: Deaf to the People
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon�s Shambles
- Ehud Ya'ari: Syria On the Boil
- David Horovitz: Setting New Standards
- Hirsh Goodman: No to Unilateralism
- Ehud Ya'ari: Iraq Now
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon�s Nemesis
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Real Issue
- Judy Maltz: Thanks, But No Thanks
- David Horovitz: Choices
- Hirsh Goodman: Mitzna, The Morning After
- Ehud Ya'ari: Not Just Anti-Semitic Lies!
- David Horovitz: A Despicable Failure of International Will
- Hirsh Goodman: Italy without the Pasta
- Ehud Ya'ari: Breaking Loose
- Stuart Schoffman: The Spider�s Strategy
- Hirsh Goodman: �Shush, There�s a War Going On�
- Ehud Ya'ari: Iraq First
- Stuart Schoffman: Gandhi�s Legacy
- David Horovitz: The Oslo Discords
- Hirsh Goodman: Wallowing in It
- Gershom Gorenberg: Sharon�s Lessons for Bush
- David Horovitz: Trouble at the Source
- Hirsh Goodman: Wake-Up Call
- Ehud Ya'ari: Great White Hope?
- David Horovitz: Savaged in the Lion�s Den
- Hirsh Goodman: Confusing Times
- David Horovitz: Full Disclosure
- Hirsh Goodman: Silence That Kills
- Ehud Ya'ari: Another Local Legend
- David Horovitz: When Nowhere Is Safe
- Gershom Gorenberg: Chelmonics
- Ehud Ya'ari: Step It up
- David Horovitz: A Vacuum in the Center
- Hirsh Goodman: Zap -- You�re Jewish
- Ehud Ya'ari: Babysitting the PA
- David Horovitz: Facts on the Ground
- Hirsh Goodman: Watch the �A� Word
- Gershom Gorenberg: Barak, Stay Home
- Ehud Ya'ari: Shortcut to Saddam
- David Horovitz: Vindication
- Hirsh Goodman: Food for Thought
- Ehud Ya'ari: Back for a While
- David Horovitz: Lerner�s Virus
- Hirsh Goodman: The Giver and the Taker
- Ehud Ya'ari: Reformation
- Masterful Sharon?
- No More Herring
- Slightly Different Terror
- Of Laws and Sausages
- What Reforms?
- Visions of Venice
- Europe Buys the Big Lie
- The Republicans Love Israel? Look Carefully.
- Three Cheers for the Spooks
- Not by Force Alone
- A Statistic Waiting for Leadership
- The Return of the PLO
- The Real War of Independence
- Ramallah Plus
- Looking to Washington
- Blood, Sweat and Cappuccino
- The Sands Are Shifting
- Who�s Preventing Normalization?
- War
- The Lieutenant�s Story
- Which Solution Do We Want?
- A Rudderless Ship
- While Syria Sleeps
- Get the Message Across
- An Unwanted Casualty
- A Lion in Winter
- The Dance of Death
- The Only Ray of Hope
- Divided We Stand
- Imagine
- Arafat Is Arafat
- Barking Up the Wrong Tree -- for Now
- Suspend Fire
- Bend, But Not Break
- Do As They Say, Not As They Do.
- Coming Clean
- Shattered
- Saddam 2002
- The Wholeness of a Split Identity
- The Hamas Challenge
- Battle Fatigue
- Beware the Generals
- Same Sharon, Same Dangers
- Stand Steadfast, on the Sidelines
- Going Nowhere
- A New Yalta
- The Wrong Coalition
- He's Not in Control
- A Degree of Intifada
- There is No Alternative
- Ominous Opportunity
- The Post-Twins Era
- My Brothers' Keeper
- Unhappy Anniversary
|