

Click for Contents

P.O. Box 1805,Jerusalem 91017
Tel. 972-2-531-5440, Fax: 972-2-537-9489
Advertising Fax: 972-2-531-5425, Email Editorial: [email protected]
Subscriptions: [email protected] Web site: http://www.jrep.com
|
|
 |



The Republicans Love Israel? Look Carefully.
Gershom Gorenberg
Democrats who demand American involvement are showing the truest support of Israel.
It's a mind-wrenching time for the grand old tribe of American Jewish liberals, as friends remind me in e-mailed angst. You have to support Israel; does that really mean you have to support everything Israel is doing? If you marched down a street in Washington with a flag to show that you don�t want your cousin in Haifa blown up, have you provided proof for Ariel Sharon that any U.S. politician who criticizes him just a wee little bit for the rampage in Ramallah will find it electorally costly?
If such dilemmas weren�t bad enough, Republicans are loudly proclaiming that they alone are the true champions of Israel�s cause. In a recent New York Times column, William Safire charged that the "Democratic Party and its liberal media voices distanced themselves from Israel" during the recent offensive in the West Bank. Those awful Dems, Safire says, called for more U.S. diplomatic involvement. They even kept Safire�s favorite Israeli, Bibi Netanyahu, from appearing before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. (Since Safire still yearns for Dick Nixon, it�s no shock he never noticed Bibi�s failure as prime minister.)
Meanwhile Gary Bauer, stalwart of the Christian Right, is reportedly proclaiming his backing of Israel in his daily e-mails to 100,000 conservatives, and House Majority Whip Tom DeLay -- when not busy proclaiming that "Christianity offers the only viable, --reasonable, definitive answer" to life�s big questions -- is co-sponsoring a resolution of solidarity with Israel. As Safire tells it, the Republican backlash against U.S. diplomatic pressure "stiffened [the] administration�s spine" -- which is how he sees President Bush�s decision to pretend Sharon didn�t ignore his demand to pull out of the West Bank immediately.
Does that mean that a decade after James Baker�s infamous comment about Jews who "don�t vote for us anyway," liberal Jews should swallow their distaste with the Republican domestic agenda and, for Israel�s sake, write checks and cast votes for conservative candidates? Absolutely not.
Start with the reasons that American conservatives support hard-line Israeli policies, which range from a one-dimensional "realism" to Christian fundamentalism. The realists are ostensibly concerned with the pragmatic issue of how to end terror and keep Israel safe. That puts them in the same conceptual universe as supporters of diplomacy, though they disagree on the methods. Like Sharon, though, the supposedly realistic conservatives see only the dimension of force. Terror is in their range of vision, and must be defeated by superior power. Palestinian aspirations to statehood and despair at living under Israeli rule are outside their perception, and needn�t ever be addressed. Behind the rational policy talk lie the emotions of macho: We�ll see who�s stronger here.
The view from my Jerusalem window is that such unrealistic realism has so far lead only to escalation. Yet however mistaken they are, the "realistic" conservatives do have Israel�s interests at heart. That�s more than can be said of the theological "support" for Israel evinced by the Christian right.
Christian conservatives start with the Biblical land-grant argument, which appeals to West Bank settlers and their fellow travelers, but which is profoundly unsettling to most of the rest of us. As Oklahoma Republican James Inhofe explained his opposition to territorial compromise in a recent Senate speech, "God appeared to Abram and said, �I am giving you this land� -- the West Bank. This is not a political battle at all. It is a contest over whether or not the word of God is true." As a religious Jew, I�d agree that our connection to the land begins in Genesis, but that doesn�t mean we need to ignore the practical or moral costs of holding the entire Land of Israel. For Inhofe, the death toll is irrelevant; the Jews� job is to stand up for his literal reading of the Bible. Sorry senator, I�m not interested in being your shahid.
The fuller version of the Christian "pro-Israel" theology comes from political preachers such as Pat Robertson. In a recent article in the Jewish web magazine Olam, Robert explained his views, though readers may have missed the meanings of his fundamentalist catch-phrases. Israel�s conquest of Jerusalem in 1967, he intimates, opened the last 40 years of history, leading to an apocalypse that could include atomic or biological weapons, "even a strike at the earth from asteroids." As the disaster approaches, "the Jewish people are going to begin to see their God" -- which for Christian fundamentalists means accepting Jesus. Israeli concessions would be wrong because they�d defy that version of prophecy. This is apocalyptic foreign policy: Support Israel not for the sake of Jewish lives, but in order to bring on doomsday and, by the way, the conversion of the Jews. With friends like this ...
Back in the real world, Israel needs to stop terror. But its long-term interest is to return to negotiations, reach a two-state settlement, and free itself of the West Bank. With Ariel Sharon and Yasser Arafat in charge of their respective nations, that�s not going to happen without outside help. Democrats who criticize Bush�s ineffectual diplomacy and demand American involvement are therefore showing the truest support of Israel.
As for American Jews, they should be demonstrating the political skills that are their pride. Tom DeLay and James Inhofe probably won�t be moved much by letters from you, but there are plenty of politicians -- Democrats and moderate Republicans -- who may think the way to purchase Jewish political backing is to sit back and watch the Mideast bleed. For Israel�s sake, please tell them otherwise, in every way you can.
(May 20, 2002)
Columnists
- David Horovitz: An Olympian Ideal
- Hirsh Goodman: Beware!
- Gershom Gorenberg: The Zealot�s Subtext
- Ehud Ya'ari: What New Order?
- David Horovitz: History Repeating Itself
- Hirsh Goodman: Legal Limits
- Ehud Ya'ari: Demolish for Peace
- Stuart Schoffman: Healing from Zion
- David Horovitz: The Pregnancy Test
- Hirsh Goodman: On Top of Everything Else
- Gershom Gorenberg: Return to Hawara
- David Horovitz: The Elephant and the Gavel
- Hirsh Goodman: Is The War Over?
- Ehud Ya'ari: Slowing Down
- David Horovitz: Making Withdrawal Even Tougher
- Hirsh Goodman: A Historic Decision
- Ehud Ya'ari: Handle with Care
- David Horovitz: Creative Thinking
- Hirsh Goodman: Beneath It All
- Ehud Ya'ari: Dreams across the River
- Stuart Schoffman: Ethics of My Father
- David Horovitz: Ask All the People
- Hirsh Goodman: The Disengagement Party
- Ehud Ya'ari: Not So Fast
- Hirsh Goodman: Still Baffled over Vanunu
- Ehud Ya'ari: �Gated Community�
- Stuart Schoffman: A Measure of Kindness
- Judy Maltz: Bibi�s Bonus
- David Horovitz: Learning From Lockerbie
- Hirsh Goodman: Happy Independence Day, Despite It All
- David Horovitz: But Was It Wise?
- Ehud Ya'ari: Keep the Gloves Off
- Stuart Schoffman: Under the Banner of Heaven
- David Horovitz: As the Walls Close In
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Eastern Border
- Gershom Gorenberg: Sharon�s Bulldozers, Then and Now
- Ehud Ya'ari: Get It Right This Time
- Judy Maltz: Bank Shots
- David Horovitz: Steering Blind
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Road to Katif
- Gershom Gorenberg: Fundamentalism on Film
- David Horovitz: A Baffling Exchange, or Worse
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Not So Bad
- Stuart Schoffman: Regime Change
- David Horovitz: Park Your Caravans Elsewhere, the Envoy Says
- Ehud Ya'ari: Marking Time, Regressively
- Gershom Gorenberg: Dump Bush, Help Israel
- David Horovitz: A Strategy for Disengagement
- Hirsh Goodman: Get Smart
- Ehud Ya'ari: Why There, and Not Here?
- Stuart Schoffman: Going South
- David Horovitz: Qadhafi or Saddam
- Hirsh Goodman: A Quiet Earthquake
- Gershom Gorenberg: Legacy of the Kiosk Caper
- Ehud Ya'ari: An Offer in Disguise
- David Horovitz: Dr. Olmert�s Diagnosis
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Northern Slippery Slope
- David Horovitz: Intolerable Complacency
- Ehud Ya'ari: �Shabbat Shalom, Dirty Jews�
- Judy Maltz: Formula for Tragedy
- David Horovitz: Not Just Anti-Semitism
- Hirsh Goodman: A Look in the Mirror
- Ehud Ya'ari: Pipe Dreams
- Stuart Schoffman: Uncomfortable Positions
- David Horovitz: The Travails of a Rejected Politician
- Hirsh Goodman: Amir's Curse
- Gershom Gorenberg: Prefer Peace to the Temple Mount
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Hamas-Jihad Axis
- David Horovitz: Sharon Loses Israel
- Hirsh Goodman: Cries in the Dark
- David Horovitz: He�s Winning
- Hirsh Goodman: Message from Above
- Ehud Ya'ari: Meet Abu Ala
- David Horovitz: Don�t Avenge Us, Protect Us
- Hirsh Goodman: A Harmful Illusion
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Either with Him -- or without Him
- Stuart Schoffman: Close to Home
- David Horovitz: Give Them All an F
- Hirsh Goodman: Gosh! We Have a Problem
- Ehud Ya'ari: Counterattack
- David Horovitz: In a Land Too Near Chelm
- Stuart Schoffman: Rejoicing with Rafaela
- David Horovitz: Happy �Hudna�?
- Hirsh Goodman: The Silence of the Lambs
- David Horovitz: Ilan Ramon�s Vital Perspective
- Hirsh Goodman: Time to Take a Bow
- Ehud Ya'ari: Syria�s Silent Earthquake
- Gershom Gorenberg: Anti-Family Values
- David Horovitz: Don�t Open the Champagne Yet
- Ehud Ya'ari: It�s Over
- Hirsh Goodman: Boom Baby Boom
- David Horovitz: The Glass Half Full
- Hirsh Goodman: Civil War, Uncivil Behavior
- Stuart Schoffman: The Circumcision Monologues
- David Horovitz: As the Pastoral Memories of Aqaba Fade
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon the Unspontaneous
- Ehud Ya'ari: Riding Low
- David Horovitz: Lobbying, and Its Limits
- Hirsh Goodman: My Yiddishe Brother
- Ehud Ya'ari: Yes Now, Buts Later
- David Horovitz: Goodbye, Mitzna. Goodbye, Labor?
- Hirsh Goodman: Boss Sharon
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Baghdad Effect
- David Horovitz: By Their Tourist Sites You Shall Know Them
- Hirsh Goodman: A �Nebechdik� Race
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Small White Hope
- David Horovitz: Thinking the Unthinkable
- Ehud Ya'ari: A Pesah Miracle
- Gershom Gorenberg: Where the Free Market Flunks
- David Horovitz: Hoping for a More Peaceful Pesah
- Hirsh Goodman: 'In-bedding'
- Ehud Ya'ari: Where Have All the Flowers Gone?
- Stuart Schoffman: The Memory of Egypt
- David Horovitz: Meanwhile, in Iran...
- Hirsh Goodman: On the Firing Line
- David Horovitz: Ejected
- Hirsh Goodman: On Hope
- Ehud Ya'ari: Mahdi Now
- David Horovitz: The Highest Stakes
- Hirsh Goodman: Danger: Big Spender
- Ehud Ya'ari: Yes, Prime Minister!
- David Horovitz: Who Won the Elections?
- Hirsh Goodman: On Symbolism
- Ehud Ya'ari: A Sinai Rendezvous
- Stuart Schoffman: Among School Children
- Ehud Ya'ari: Beware of a �Farhoud�
- David Horovitz: Deaf to the People
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon�s Shambles
- Ehud Ya'ari: Syria On the Boil
- David Horovitz: Setting New Standards
- Hirsh Goodman: No to Unilateralism
- Ehud Ya'ari: Iraq Now
- Hirsh Goodman: Sharon�s Nemesis
- Ehud Ya'ari: The Real Issue
- Judy Maltz: Thanks, But No Thanks
- David Horovitz: Choices
- Hirsh Goodman: Mitzna, The Morning After
- Ehud Ya'ari: Not Just Anti-Semitic Lies!
- David Horovitz: A Despicable Failure of International Will
- Hirsh Goodman: Italy without the Pasta
- Ehud Ya'ari: Breaking Loose
- Stuart Schoffman: The Spider�s Strategy
- Hirsh Goodman: �Shush, There�s a War Going On�
- Ehud Ya'ari: Iraq First
- Stuart Schoffman: Gandhi�s Legacy
- David Horovitz: The Oslo Discords
- Hirsh Goodman: Wallowing in It
- Gershom Gorenberg: Sharon�s Lessons for Bush
- David Horovitz: Trouble at the Source
- Hirsh Goodman: Wake-Up Call
- Ehud Ya'ari: Great White Hope?
- David Horovitz: Savaged in the Lion�s Den
- Hirsh Goodman: Confusing Times
- David Horovitz: Full Disclosure
- Hirsh Goodman: Silence That Kills
- Ehud Ya'ari: Another Local Legend
- David Horovitz: When Nowhere Is Safe
- Gershom Gorenberg: Chelmonics
- Ehud Ya'ari: Step It up
- David Horovitz: A Vacuum in the Center
- Hirsh Goodman: Zap -- You�re Jewish
- Ehud Ya'ari: Babysitting the PA
- David Horovitz: Facts on the Ground
- Hirsh Goodman: Watch the �A� Word
- Gershom Gorenberg: Barak, Stay Home
- Ehud Ya'ari: Shortcut to Saddam
- David Horovitz: Vindication
- Hirsh Goodman: Food for Thought
- Ehud Ya'ari: Back for a While
- David Horovitz: Lerner�s Virus
- Hirsh Goodman: The Giver and the Taker
- Ehud Ya'ari: Reformation
- Masterful Sharon?
- No More Herring
- Slightly Different Terror
- Of Laws and Sausages
- What Reforms?
- Visions of Venice
- Europe Buys the Big Lie
- The Republicans Love Israel? Look Carefully.
- Three Cheers for the Spooks
- Not by Force Alone
- A Statistic Waiting for Leadership
- The Return of the PLO
- The Real War of Independence
- Ramallah Plus
- Looking to Washington
- Blood, Sweat and Cappuccino
- The Sands Are Shifting
- Who�s Preventing Normalization?
- War
- The Lieutenant�s Story
- Which Solution Do We Want?
- A Rudderless Ship
- While Syria Sleeps
- Get the Message Across
- An Unwanted Casualty
- A Lion in Winter
- The Dance of Death
- The Only Ray of Hope
- Divided We Stand
- Imagine
- Arafat Is Arafat
- Barking Up the Wrong Tree -- for Now
- Suspend Fire
- Bend, But Not Break
- Do As They Say, Not As They Do.
- Coming Clean
- Shattered
- Saddam 2002
- The Wholeness of a Split Identity
- The Hamas Challenge
- Battle Fatigue
- Beware the Generals
- Same Sharon, Same Dangers
- Stand Steadfast, on the Sidelines
- Going Nowhere
- A New Yalta
- The Wrong Coalition
- He's Not in Control
- A Degree of Intifada
- There is No Alternative
- Ominous Opportunity
- The Post-Twins Era
- My Brothers' Keeper
- Unhappy Anniversary
|